Court of Appeals opinion in “Bouvia v. Superior Court”

 Explain whether you think the court of Appeals opinion in “Bouvia v. Superior Court” rejects Kant’s reasoning. Next you must consider John Stuart Mills opinión that  one has the right to tell another person of maturity “that he shall not do what his life for his own benefit what he chooses to do with it,” a proposition rejected by Gerald Dworkin who thinks that most people would consent to being governed by laws restricting people from doing what is only a danger to or is harmful to oneself. finally after dicussing whether you think the California Court of Appeals is in accord with Kant’s reasoning you must argue whether you think the court of appeals opinion in “Bouvia v. Superior Court” accepts Either Mills resoning over Kant’s resoning or Gerald Dworkings reasoning over Mills reasoning.