According to the writer, Socratic methods signify the methods to look for truth by personal lights when well defined. In other words, it is a certain kind of philosophical inquiry, a method, a spirit, an intellectual tactic, a system, all trundled into one. This method is named after Socrates. It was named after him because he modeled for us philosophy practice. In it, he delineated philosophy as something that any of us can do, as a deed, and as a way of living. An individual who was Socrates scholar clarified Socratic Methods as a common human experience available to every man. It normally calls for common sense and common speech as an alternative instead of necessitating allegiance to a particular analytical technique or perception (Phillips, 2017). The Socratic method goes beyond Vlastos’ account, whereby it calls for common sense and scrutinizes what common sense denotes. Vlasto’s account proceeds by clarifying that Socratic inquiry calls for higher-order moral qualities and the highest degree of psychological attentiveness that any individual can. Examples of such values include humility, sincerity, and courage. Having these values protect someone from the Socratic dialogue.
Socratizing is normally the case that some abstract notions are closely connected to the deepest pertinent humanoid experiences. Sustained effort to explore the ramifications of specific opinions and offer compelling alternatives and objections differentiate the Socratic method from the mere nonsystematic inquiry. As a result, an exhaustive and scrupulous inquiry from numerous ways bears a resemblance to the scientific method (Phillips, 2017 (Phillips, 2017). Socrates centered mainly on human beings and their universe within, using his method to open up innovative realms of self-knowledge. Intellectuals normally refer to Socrates’ methods as elenchus. It is a Greek term for cross-examination or inquiry. This is the kind that discloses individuals to themselves and makes them perceive what their sentiments amount to.
Socrates’ method is an important part of existence. According to Socrates, continuous use of this technique makes individuals more contented. However, it comes with a price that can make individuals either more uncertain, unhappier, more troubled in addition to more contented. There lacks no good divide between someone’s perception of life and that of philosophy (Anne, 2020). The Socratic method forces individuals to deal with their personal dogmatism. Partakers in the Socratic dialogue are in effect, forcing themselves to be free. This method needs that honestly and amenably, sensibly, and inventively, the individuals confront the doctrine by inquiring what it signifies. The Socratic method requires us to discover other viewpoints inquiring about something that might be said.
Anne L’Arrivee, E. (2020). Refute Thyself: The Socratic Method in Plato’s Republic Book 4. The European Legacy, 1-18.
Phillips, C., & DeLeon, B. (2017). Redefining the Can-Do Attitude, The Language of a Critical Thinking Culture. Defense Acquisition University’s Defense Systems Management College Fort Belvoir United States.