In doing so, focus on one significant concept, theory, topic, or theme as the basis for your comparison, and describe both the similarities and differences between the three perspectives. Also, conclude by briefly evaluating both the strengths and weakne
Please use only the book on Comparative Political Theory Introduction by Fred Dallmayr Palgrave Macmillian 2010
Directions: The purpose of the essay is to demonstrate that you have completed and reflected on the assigned readings and discussions from Part II of the course; outside research is not required or suggested. Your essay should be approximately 2,000 words long (typed double-spaced, standard Times New Roman 12-point font, normal one-inch margins) and formatted in MLA style with in-text citations and a Works Cited list (see attached guides). It should include a title, introduction, body, and conclusion; and be based on synthesis, analysis, and evaluation of the assigned readings. Revise and edit your writing for clarity, concision, and grammatical correctness before submitting.
Topic: The readings (Dallmayr, ed., Comparative Political Theory) from Part II of the course approach political theory from comparative/civilizational perspectives. Compare the three perspectives (Middle Eastern, South Asian, and East Asian) on political thought considered in Part II of the course. In doing so, focus on one significant concept, theory, topic, or theme as the basis for your comparison, and describe both the similarities and differences between the three perspectives. Also, conclude by briefly evaluating both the strengths and weaknesses of the comparative/civilizational approach to political theory.
