Politics
What do you think was the key argument in the paper? Was it convincing? What was the main methodology used in the paper? Was it clear? What were the parts you found most interesting in the paper, and why? What were the parts that you didn’t enjoy? Why? Were there parts that were difficult to understand? How does the paper relate to your previous knowledge in Politics and/or International Relations? Can you link it up with any previous theories you’ve studied? Or, do you think the ideas in the paper are applicable to other contexts? instruction: The reflective piece has a clear structure, the arguments are logical and easy to follow. You provide an excellent account of your own opinion of the paper and justify your opinion with well‐structured arguments. You provide well‐ rounded and thorough criticism of the paper, and link it up convincingly with your previous studies in Politics and/or International Relations, including references. There are no typos and the usage of English is perfect.
